This is perhaps the most significant fact we know about learning, yet it is almost completely ignored by the ‘curse of the course and classroom’. We learn through practice, little and often.
Ebbinghaus proved it in 1885, and almost everyone in the learning profession has studiously ignored it for well over a century. Demster reported this sad state of affairs in “American Psychologist” (The Spacing Effect: A Case Study in the Failure to Apply the Results of Psychological Research, 1988).
We forget things quickly and the most effective way to prevent this forgetting is to practice at spaced intervals over time. Knowledge is easy to learn but hard to retain. Forget this and you condemn yourself to, at best, unnecessary effort in learning, at worst failing to learn much at all – the true story behind most learning effort.
This well-known phenomenon is extremely common in training. A lack of understanding about how memory works leads to a lack of preparation of material in terms of size, order and engagement which in turn leads to weak encoding, a lack of deep processing and ultimately poor retention and recall.
Almost all courses are too long. Most courses present material in the wrong way and lead to unnecessary forgetting. Simplify to prevent cognitive overload.
This is perhaps the easiest and simplest piece learning theory to put into practice. Chunking means being sensitive to the limitation of working memory. Less is more in learning.
Distilling, rather than enhancing, elaborating and creating lots of distracting noise, is a virtue in teaching.
Unfortunately, the ‘song and dance’ act in the classroom is often cacophonous.
The order in which you learn things is critical to how they will be stored and recalled; yet, education and training continue to jumble and confuse content.
The correct order is critical in language learning, science, maths and indeed in every subject. Learn things in the wrong order and you’ll end up having to unlearn.
Once you understand that the things we learn are stored differently, i.e. we have different types of memory, then you’ll be more sensitive to the necessary differences in training.
We still have far too much reliance on text (semantic) for subjects that need a visual (episodic) approach.
You see this everywhere, from text-heavy PowerPoints to whiteboards, manuals and hand-outs.
Learning does not take place without psychological attention; so, setting up classrooms and scenarios that inhibit attention, or distract from learning, is massively counter-productive.
I fear that much so-called ‘collaborative learning’ falls into this trap. Cramming people into small, airless classrooms is no way to encourage attention.
The bottom line is that most learning is best done on your own or one-to-one.
We know that recall is enhanced by learning in the physical context in which one is expected to perform. Yet, most teaching is done in alien environments – classrooms and training centres.
We have plenty of proof that work-placed learning needs to be massively increased and non-contextual classroom teaching decreased.
From William James and John Dewy through to Kolb and Schank, we’ve had a torrent of theories showing that we learn lots by doing, yet so much teaching and training is locked into an over-theoretical, knowledge and not skills, model.
There is barely a subject in training that wouldn’t benefit from a boost in experiential learning.
The work of Judith Harris (“The Nurture Assumption”) will change the whole way you look at parenting and teaching.
Her revolutionary scientific work showed that most books on parenting and teaching overestimate the influence of parents and teachers, and under-estimate the role of genetics and peer pressure.
There are some real and practical steps one can take to avoid the obvious traps. These are largely ignored in training. Read the book.
This is perhaps the most useful piece of scientific advice for teachers and trainers – dump the snake oil techniques.
These include learning styles, playing music while you learn, Brain Gym, left-right brain theories, NLP, stating the objectives at the start of a course, the list goes on.
This was a guest post by Learning Evangelist, Donald Clark.
How many employees require elearning?
+44 (0) 207 101 9383
+44 (0) 207 101 9383
US (857) 284-1420
+44 (0) 845 074 4114*
* call charges vary depending on your provider